To our loyal readers, posts will crawl to a minimum now that I am studying for finals.  Enjoy the NBA playoffs.

Please remember that the information in this blog is NOT LEGAL ADVICE. It is provided for EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY. If you need legal advice regarding a criminal matter, please contact a licensed attorney.

Duke won the national championship last night, but similar to the Baylor game, this one was not without a late-game, controversial offensive foul.  I have been looking for the video online but cannot find it.  Late in the game (I think there were a little over a minute left),  Gordon Hayward (who I am surprised he does not play for Duke since he is white and good) drove to the basket and was undercut by one of the Duke guys (Singler or Scheyer).  Hayward ended up making the shot for the and 1, but the refs ruled it was a charge…even though the defenders legs were still moving and even though he was directly under the basket.  Those two, if not three points (Hayward had not missed a free-throw all night) would have been the difference in the game.

While you cannot file this one under the TV ratings conspiracy theory, this may fall under the conspiracy theory involving the NCAA wanting BCS teams to win national championships.  However, that is even pretty far out there for me to buy into.  Maybe, as a life-long tar heels fan, I really did not want to see Duke win.  However, they had a great team and hats off to them and Coach K.

I stumbled upon this while looking for the Hayward charge video.  It is “One Shining Moment” sans Jennifer Hudson.  Someone who could not win American Idol should not be singing the best montage in sports.  Take it away Luther Vandross:

Call it a wild conspiracy theory, but I believe the charge called on Acey was a “David Stern”-like ploy to get ratings happy Duke into the Final Four.

“The selection committee knew the NCAA is in the process of deciding whether to opt out of the final three years (2011-13) of its 11-year, $6 billion contract with CBS. If the contract is put on the open market, it is smart (TV) business to attempt to maximize – big-time – the 2010 tourney’s ratings.”  NY Daily News (commenting on why Duke was given the easiest regional bracket).

Clearly Zoubek did not have position and Baylor was posed to take over before the “and 1″ was taken away.

You make the call:

d. Attorney Conference

The attorney conference should take about 5 minutes. It takes place after the client has left. It gives the attorneys a chance to talk about the issues without the client present.

Continue reading »

c. Ending

The ending of the client consultation is where you need to cross your t’s and dot your i’s. Unlike the middle of the round, here the attorneys should be doing most of the talking. Attorneys should be making sure that anything the client wanted addressed in their consolation is addressed.

i.  Catering to the client’s needs

After an attorney has “looped” a clients narrative back to them, it is time to make sure the client is satisfied with the meeting. This can be accomplished by asking questions like “based on our conversation today, do you have any other questions for us?”. Or “Is there any question you have that we have not addressed?”. These questions make sure you satisfy the client by directly asking them if they are satisfied, instead of just guessing. Continue reading »